Determining fitness to work at safety-sensitive jobs

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 52 , No. 1 , January February 2010 , Pages 48 WorkSafeBC

On occasion, physicians may be asked to determine if an individual is fit for work. When the individual’s job is safety sensitive, making that determination can be quite a complex task.


On occasion, physicians may be asked to determine if an individual is fit for work. When the individual’s job is safety sensitive, making that determination can be quite a complex task.

What is a safety-sensitive job?
Safety-sensitive jobs are ones where impaired performance, for whatever reason, could result in a significant incident affecting the health or safety of employees, customers, customers’ employees, the public, property, or the environment.

Scenario
• Tom Smith, a 40-year-old crane operator, suffered a head injury in a motor vehicle accident and, as a result, has residual unpredictable migraine-like headaches (photophobia, vomiting, tunnel vision, motor impairment in right dominant arm) and a seizure disorder (grand mal). Each day he takes six to eight Tyle­nol 3s for his headaches and carbamazepine (Tegretol) for his seizures.

Can Mr Smith return to work? Much of the decision is based on whether or not his job is considered safety sensitive.

Factors to consider
In some safety-sensitive situations, organizations such as Transport Can­ada, WorkSafeBC, and the Motor Vehicle Branch have restrictions that remove or limit the amount of physician judgment required in determining fitness to work.

In the vast majority of situations, you must determine fitness to work or return to work based on reasonable medical judgment, relying on the most current medical knowledge and the best objective evidence of whether the individual’s medical condition—including recreational substance use—is a potential or direct threat to self or others. 

More specifically, you must consider whether the individual participating in a job or returning to an unmodified job poses a risk of significant harm to self or others.

You must have a clear understanding of the essential tasks of the individual’s job. In some cases, you may already be aware of the job requirements; in others, you may require a job description or job demands analysis from the employer, or a discussion with a WorkSafeBC officer to determine the details of the job. Remember, you must maintain patient confidentiality when speaking directly to an employer or employee representative.

Making the decision
Determining whether an individual poses a risk requires a case-by-case assessment of the individual’s present medical condition and how it may affect his or her ability to safely perform essential job functions. You should consider the duration of the risk, nature and severity of the potential harm, likelihood that the potential harm will occur, and imminence of the potential harm.

Keep in mind, as the physician, you are responsible for assessing the medical impairments that result in contraindications to engaging in certain work tasks. If you overstate or understate the level of impairment, and thus the level of disability, you could be held accountable; so, it’s important to correctly identify the appropriate level of impairment—to the best of your ability.

Determining Tom Smith’s fitness to work
Mr Smith has two medical conditions that require medication. Either of these conditions may cause temporary impairment of function, which poses a significant threat of harm to self—the onset of headache or seizure may cause him to fall while climbing a ladder to access the cab; or to others—loss of control over the load being lifted at the time of onset. 

In addition, there are potential side effects of each drug, on their own or in combination. Mr Smith will also have lost his driver’s licence and therefore won’t be able to operate a personal or commercial vehicle.

The bottom line is that Mr Smith is not fit for work in this safety-sensitive environment.

While the above example is straight­forward, some situations are not. For example, a surgeon with un­controlled postural hypo­tension or a bradyarrhythmia leading to syncope may be safe to work in the office, but not in the OR, until the condition is controlled.

For more information or assistance in determining fitness to work in safety sensitive jobs, please contact a medical advisor in the nearest WorkSafeBC office.
—Steve Martin, MD, MSc, FCBOM, Dip Sport Med
WorkSafeBC Medical Advisor, Occupational Diseases Services

Olympic reminder
Since WorkSafeBC covers workers but not volunteers, please do not submit F8s for injured volunteers.

Correction—inorganic lead
Due to a type conversion mistake, the BCMJ introduced an error into the November 2009 WorkSafeBC column “Occupational exposure to inorganic lead” (51[9]:388). In four instances, the abbreviation “mg” was substituted for “µg.” Wherever “mg” appears it should read “µg.” The correct version is posted at www.bcmj.org/worksafebc/occupational-exposure-inorganic-lead. We apologize to both readers and the author, Dr Ailve McNestry, for this error.

Steve Martin, MD, CCFP, MScOH, FCBOM, DipSportMed. Determining fitness to work at safety-sensitive jobs. BCMJ, Vol. 52, No. 1, January, February, 2010, Page(s) 48 - WorkSafeBC.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.