The consensus? There is no consensus.

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 50 , No. 1 , January February 2008 , Pages 10 President's Comment

The Conversation on Health was launched by Premier Gordon Campbell in September 2006 and concluded 1 year later.  

During that time the process in­volved 78 meetings with virtually every group that has a stake in health care, including health care profes­sionals, patients, and the public, and received over 12000 submissions.

The 1500-page summary of input report was released by the government 30 November 2007. It is important to realize that this is purely a compilation of the input and does not contain specific recommendations. The government is now having internal discussions about the report and we expect to hear recommendations in the spring of 2008 and going forward.

In reviewing the summary of input, the consensus is that there is no consensus. A wide range of opinions and proposed solutions are included, but no clear direction is provided. Having said this, several important themes in the summary bear serious reflection in terms of the potential impact on health care for our patients and on our profession.

The issues around access are obviously of primary importance. Whether talking about wait-list guarantees or building more infrastructure, British Columbians tell us that they want better, faster access to care. From this there needs to be real progress on maximum wait times for procedures, emergency care, and primary care.

Concerns in the area of acute care and long-term care capacity are also of prime importance and consistent with the recommendations in the BCMA submission to the Conver­sation.

In terms of sustainability we recog­nize that tough decisions will need to be made in the years ahead. Indeed our submission strongly suggests that the principle of sustainability be added to the original five principles of the Canada Health Act. Sustainability, in our recommendations, means determining the scope of publicly funded services, implementing cost-sharing arrangements on a fair and equitable basis, and taking a hard look at support for informal and family caregivers.

Personal responsibility for health care and costs is a significant element in both the summary report and the BCMA submission that includes health promotion and prevention initiatives.  

Scope of practice has its own section in the report, and specifically nurses and pharmacists are identified by the public as key professionals best qualified to assist in alleviating phy­sicians’ workload. We know that government is seriously looking into scope of practice regulations and we anticipate changes in the months and years ahead.

It is gratifying to see that many of our recommendations have been quoted or referenced, however time will tell just how far the government will move on these issues or will be constrained by political expediency.

-Geoffrey Appleton, MB
BCMA President

Geoffrey Appleton, MB,. The consensus? There is no consensus.. BCMJ, Vol. 50, No. 1, January, February, 2008, Page(s) 10 - President's Comment.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply