Surgical waits blamed on lack of OR time

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 53 , No. 10 , December 2011 , Pages 563 News

A new report released by the Fraser Institute, titled “Why We Wait: Physician Opinions on Factors Affecting Health Care Wait Times,” cites a lack of operating room time and changes in patient case loads as two of the most commonly reported factors behind increased wait times for medical care and surgical procedures.

The report analyzes physicians’ responses to the Institute’s annual Waiting Your Turn survey on health care wait times, and the reasons they gave for changes in their waiting lists.

Among the physicians who reported increased wait times in 2010, the lack of available operating room time was cited by 67.9% as the reason why their wait lists had increased. The next most cited reasons were changes in patient case load (38.8%) and lack of available hospital beds (29.5%).

When the responses to the survey questions are broken down by pro­vince or medical specialty, the majority of respondents say either the availability of operating room time or change in patient case load is the primary reason for increases in wait times. The one exception is radiation oncologists, who said the availability of technical staff was the primary reason for both increased or decreased waiting times.

The study also expands the data to include physician responses dating back to 2001, and finds that a lack of operating room time has consistently been the most cited factor by physicians for increases in wait times.

The report can be viewed at

. Surgical waits blamed on lack of OR time. BCMJ, Vol. 53, No. 10, December, 2011, Page(s) 563 - News.

Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.

For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.