Re: The unknown doctor

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 43 , No. 5 , June 2001 , Pages 263 Letters

The letter from Dr Michael Alms [BCMJ 2001;43(2):68] raised a matter that should concern all medical educators. It is even more timely now that the BCMJ recently commented on the problem and the media had a field day alarming Canadians about what was going on in their medical schools. Like Dr Alms, I too have been in the patient situation and am disgusted at the non-professional, egotistical, impersonal attitude displayed by many consultants and department heads under whom patients are admitted in teaching hospitals. I understand the necessity for training in history taking, physical examination, etc., and patient encounter is essential. But a study has revealed examinations without patient consent or on comatose or unconscious patients, as well as procedures carried out by junior staff with little or inadequate training. Investigation has confirmed that admitting consultants often never see these patients. Resident staff is the only contact, and even that may be episodic and insufficient. Quite forgotten is the duty of senior staff to personally monitor and visit patients under their care.

What has happened to our ethics that one no longer feels an obligation to live up to the duties and heritage of the medical profession? Surely the prestige of an academic appointment carries with it a responsibility for the personal touch and reassurance that are so vital for the sick and ailing. I recall with admiration and gratitude the grand ward rounds that were an important part of the postgrad experience. The role models were right there with the students and trainees at the bedside. Too bad this tradition is no longer considered necessary in the era of medicare.

—Manning L. Mador, MD 
Past President, Ontario Medical Association 
Past President, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Manning L. Mador, MD. Re: The unknown doctor. BCMJ, Vol. 43, No. 5, June, 2001, Page(s) 263 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply