Re: Quality of death

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 54 , No. 8 , October 2012 , Pages 382 Letters

Once more I am justified in my respect for Dr R. Gallagher—I very much appreciated her thoughtful COHP ar-ticle, “Quality of death,” in the July/August issue [BCMJ 2012;54:292-293].

Her comments reflect what I also experienced when I was actively involved in hospital care and palliative care wards. I often wondered at the number of elderly, frail geriatric patients in the ICU/CCU. Do we really practise the ethical principles des­cribed and plan for the future critical management of elderly patients in our practices? 

In the same issue of the BCMJ, the college library cites some 36000 articles on palliative care, 50 quality texts, and even some DVDs, and the topical issue of euthanasia is once again in the daily news. 

I would add to Dr Gallagher’s article that in cases of terminal disease, a combination of family guilt, social dysfunction (always a part of front-line medicine), and heavy impetus for excessive interventions leads us to de­lay consideration of palliative options and overlook respect for the dying process. 

Those in silos of care as specialists are not in a position to discuss such issues in a timely fashion. Now that I am primarily office-based, it is truly a rarity that hospital-based physicians call me to explore what I call “sensible” care of the elderly (i.e., no heroics when the outcome is glaringly obvious). One shining exception oc­curred recently when one of my frail patients ran into difficulties—not un­expected—when undergoing trans­cath­eter cardiac valve replacement and the complicating issue of ongoing treatment with warfarin, the nightmare for post-op care after such a procedure. The specialist and I agreed on simple ASA/Plavix, since Pradax, etc., still require the clearance of hurdles.

The GP is in the optimal position—ideally knowing the patient and family—to address dire possibilities earlier rather than later and to make wise choices in interventional care when complex care of the elderly begins. I try early on to bring up the concept of patient autonomy, encouraging patients to express clear opinions on interventions of a heroic nature, and to document their wishes in the presence of family members.

Now, if we only could get more committed and enthusiastic generalists and GPs—another topic altogther!
—John de Couto, MD
New Westminster

Dr de Couto raises the issue of the importance of understanding and res­pec­ting the wishes of our elderly patients, particularly when it comes to health care decisions at the end of life. Fraser Health’s End of Life program is introducing MOST—Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment—an initiative to improve such care for our seniors. As part of advance care planning, which includes information for patients and guidance for health care providers on facilitating discussions, MOST provides a way to document therapy and intervention decisions in the event of serious illness. The directions for care are available to acute and community caregivers and ensure that we do truly provide the care desired by the patient. —AIC

John de Couto, MD,. Re: Quality of death. BCMJ, Vol. 54, No. 8, October, 2012, Page(s) 382 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.