On behalf of the College, I applaud Dr Alan Ruddiman for his courage and leadership in expressing his personal view on the current opioid crisis in his thoughtful piece, “Opioid prescribing: The profession and the patients we serve and support” [BCMJ 2016;58:439,441].
While virtually all physicians yearn to be better prescribers of opioids and other potentially addictive medications, we have sadly seen far too many cases like “Jack’s,” as described by Dr Ruddiman. Prescribing by some physicians has undoubtedly played a part in the current crisis, and as such, the College echoes his call for physicians to collectively help address it.
One of the most common challenges for physicians, as identified in Dr Ruddiman’s piece, is not knowing what to say to patients who are clearly suffering from pain but who are also vulnerable to potential harms from long-term opioid use. Physicians have an appetite for and are highly receptive to scripts, which they can acquire by calling the College or attending CME activities such as the College Prescribers Course, the Foundation for Medical Excellence Chronic Pain Management Conference (register for both on the College website), or the PSP Chronic Pain Module. Ultimately, patients are owed the information they need to make safe and appropriate choices. That cannot be accomplished without speaking frankly.
Physicians should never forget that they are professionally responsible for the prescription that they provide—both to the patient and public. The standard Safe Prescribing of Drugs with Potential for Misuse/Diversion is written with enough flexibility for physicians to make professional judgments that are in the best interests of individual patients. We thank Dr Ruddiman for his leadership in recognizing that the profession has an obligation to prescribe safely.
—Gerrard A. Vaughan, MD
College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org