Re: Fragility fracture and osteoporosis investigation

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 47 , No. 1 , January February 2005 , Pages 12 Letters

The authors of the paper “Fragility fracture and osteoporosis investigation” suggest family physicians in British Columbia are undertreating osteoporosis.[1] They conclude as a possible solution, “Patients with fractures might be referred for densitometry on admission to the emergency department and might also be offered information on supplements (calcium and vitamin D) and exercise for bone health.”

According to the MSP/BCMA clinical practice guidelines and patient information pamphlet, “Approximately 66% of BC women over 40 would be considered to have osteoporosis or osteopenia when their bone density results are compared to those of young adults.” The clinical practice guidelines state, “Patients with low trauma fractures may be assumed to have severe osteoporosis if other pathology has been ruled out and should be treated accordingly. Bone density measurement is not required to confirm osteoporosis in such cases, but may be useful as a baseline agent on which to measure the treatment.”

As family physicians, we are faced with a bewildering number of sometimes contradictory clinical practice guidelines. A recent statement of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal suggests that all women 65 years or older should undergo repeat DEXA every 1 to 2 years regardless of the results of the initial DEXA (even if the result is normal).[2] This is in agreement with the US Preventive Services Task Force and the Osteoporosis Society of Canada.

All family physicians in British Columbia recently received a large binder containing the “Guidelines and Protocols for the Province of British Columbia” for many medical conditions. From my understanding of the literature, the BC Government recommendations regarding bone density testing[3] seem the most logical. Yet the authors of the above paper, likely unintentionally, are implying that those of us who follow the BC Guidelines are providing inadequate care.

Since we should all be recommending exercise and calcium for our older patients anyway, surely precious health care dollars would be better spent on other needs within the health care system.

—John Sehmer, MD
Vancouver


References

1. Ashe MC, Kahn KM, Guy P, et al. Fragility fracture and osteoporosis investigation. BCMJ 2004;46:506-509. Full Text 
2. Prevention of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women: recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force of Preventive Health Care. CMAJ 2004;170:1665-1667. PubMed Citation Full Text 
3. Guidelines and Protocols Advisory Committee: Guidelines and Protocols for the province of British Columbia. www.healthservices.gov.bc.ca/msp/proto guides/index.html (accessed 10 January 2005).

John Sehmer, MD. Re: Fragility fracture and osteoporosis investigation . BCMJ, Vol. 47, No. 1, January, February, 2005, Page(s) 12 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply