Re: Evidence-based medicine

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 52 , No. 3 , April 2010 , Pages 119 Letters

I very much enjoyed both the humor and the not-so-hidden subtext of the letter on evidence-based medicine, submitted by my friend and colleague Dr Ian Mitchell [BCMJ 2009;51(10):426].

Along the same lines, would it be possible for one of our esteemed experts to ponder the following question: Is there evidence that evidence-based medicine is beneficial in the scenario of the individual patient, individual physician, office visit context?

We are all aware of patients who do seem to do well with a medication whose benefits have been nullified or disparaged by a team of worthy evaluators. Is this entirely placebo effect, or could it be due to difference within populations? Can large-population studies be extrapolated to the individual?

Of course, we must all be aware of such studies when we are making therapeutic decisions. But sometimes a hunch, based in part on intimate knowledge of the patient, turns out to be the solution to a puzzle. Surely this is one of the advantages to having a GP to call one’s own.

Unfortunately, the EBM proponents (all of us!) have the power to sway bureaucratic decisions. It isn’t right to deny a patient coverage of a medication just because the Therapeutics Initiative says a lesser product is just as good. I can personally attest that pantoprazole works better for me than does rabeprazole, and Therapeutic Initiatives cannot argue that point!
—Lorne Walton, MD
Maple Ridge

Lorne Walton, MD,. Re: Evidence-based medicine. BCMJ, Vol. 52, No. 3, April, 2010, Page(s) 119 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply