BCMA benefits decision

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 52 , No. 1 , January February 2010 , Pages 8 Letters

On 21 July 2009, I underwent open heart valve surgery at the age of 66. I have been a full member of the BCMA since I entered practice in 1971 and continue to be in full surgical practice and an active member to this day. I have not had a single previous disability claim in my career. Until now.


On 21 July 2009, I underwent open heart valve surgery at the age of 66. I have been a full member of the BCMA since I entered practice in 1971 and continue to be in full surgical practice and an active member to this day. I have not had a single previous disability claim in my career. Until now. 

You can imagine my disappointment when I applied for PDI benefits (jointly funded by the BCMA and provincial government) and was told by the insurance office that coverage ends at age 65 and so I was automatically deregistered from the PDI program on my 65th birthday.

During my 6-week recuperation off work, I was surprised and encouraged to hear from a GP colleague that in fact the age 65 expiration of benefits had been extended to age 70, as so many docs like myself were not retiring at the magic age of 65. He showed me the letter from the BCMA documenting this change, but I did not remember ever receiving it.

When I called the BCMA insurance office, the reason I did not receive the letter became clear. The changes in the coverage were put into place 8 months after my 65th birthday and only applied to those physicians who were already registered in the PDI program. Although I have been a member of the BCMA for almost 40 years, am still a member, and continue to be in full practice, I am apparently not entitled to the extended coverage to age 70 because I was automatically deregistered on my 65th birthday, 8 months before the rule change!

I find this totally unacceptable. This extended coverage was introduc­ed specifically for physicians like myself. The first thing that was done was to exclude those for whom it was designed. To deny the coverage to an active member of almost 40 years is downright insulting.

The Insurance Committee met to consider the matter. It decided that there could be no change because there was no further funding to cover the group of doctors presently between 65 and 70. On the other hand they stated that when the extension to age 70 was introduced, there was no increase in funding from the BCMA and government at all. The plan was to monitor the situation and just see if the present level of funding would be sufficient to cover it.

Well, maybe they should have done the right thing and immediately reregistered all those BCMA members between the ages of 65 and 70 who were still in active practice when the rules changed so that doctors who had been paying into the PDI fund for their whole careers would also receive the extended benefits that they justly deserve.

I don’t know how many of you out there fall into this category or are aware that you have been excluded from disability coverage that has been extended to all other BCMA members (those under 65 as of 1 April 2008).

So, now you know. I encourage you and all other members who also feel that there has been a travesty of justice to speak your minds so that this wrong can be made right.
—Michael Frimer, MD
Richmond

Michael Frimer, MD,. BCMA benefits decision. BCMJ, Vol. 52, No. 1, January, February, 2010, Page(s) 8 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.