When I told a colleague that I had recently accepted the position of medical community liaison for ICBC, he asked me why I had “crossed the floor.” His response certainly gave me food for thought. “Crossing the floor” implies antagonism and betrayal. Is that really the case?
I applied for the position because it seemed to offer an interesting opportunity. In our current environment of time pressures, excessive paperwork, high expectations, and doctor shortages, most practitioners are struggling to provide quality time and service to their patients, their families, and themselves within the constraints of College’s guidelines, billing parameters, confidentiality/privacy concerns, and a 24-hour day. As a semi-retired general practitioner with an interest in musculoskeletal medicine, I thought I would be able to use my experience and knowledge to help physicians and ICBC personnel work together for patient care and public safety in a way that does not increase, and hopefully might even lessen, the burden on physicians. Idealistic perhaps, but that is my overall goal. Not “crossing the floor” to the other side but attempting to shorten the distance between two groups.
The most frequent interaction between ICBC and physicians involves a patient with a whiplash-type injury who visits his or her family doctor. So, let us begin there.
A patient’s first visit after a car crash
When a patient arrives at the office with a whiplash-type injury from a car crash, the medical office assistant and physician should note that the reason for the visit is an injury sustained in a motor vehicle accident. It is important to code visits as MVA-related for billing purposes because these visits do not use general MSP funding.
Many offices start collecting this information by having the MOA provide the patient with a questionnaire at the beginning of the first visit. Typically, the questionnaire collects information on the MVA itself, as well as injuries sustained and symptomatology. This means that by the time the patient sees the doctor, many facts are already documented and a significant amount of time has been saved, thus freeing the physician to elaborate on the data before examining the patient.
Why are the facts of the crash noteworthy? The direction and force of impact, position of the patient at the time of impact, seatbelt use, position of the headrest, anticipation of the collision, and bracing can all play a role in the injuries sustained and their related recovery.
So what actually happens in the typical rear-ender?
When a vehicle is struck from behind, the force of the collision pushes the vehicle forward and the occupant’s torso is struck by the seatback. This pushes the body forward and causes some straightening of the spine, which elevates the head and results in axial loading as well as extension or hyperextension of the cervical spine.
As the seatback pushes forward, the headrest is forced into the back of the skull. If the headrest is properly adjusted with the top of the headrest above eye level, it will limit the amount of extension of the cervical spine. If the headrest isn’t properly adjusted, or if there is significant elevation of the body, the neck may hyperextend, which can result in more severe injuries.
Within milliseconds, the neck rebounds forward and the head catapults into a chin-on-chest position. The torso is held in check by the three-point seatbelt and the head movement is unchecked unless an airbag is deployed.
If the head is turned at the time of the collision or if other rotational forces are experienced, shearing forces are brought into play and can modify the injuries sustained. This is why it is important to ask patients what they were looking at or doing at the time of impact.
Other questions to ask
Onset and timing of pain is important. Generally, pain that begins the morning after the MVA is milder than and not as long-lasting as pain that begins immediately after the collision. It is also important to note pre-existing and coexisting relevant conditions that may pertain to injuries sustained and subsequent recovery.
There is considerable information to collect from a patient following an MVA. Much of the information we have discussed can be obtained in a questionnaire provided to a patient by your MOA before you have even walked into the examining room. If you currently use a questionnaire and are willing to share it in order to develop a prototype, I would appreciate receiving a copy at Laura.Jensen@ICBC.com or via fax at 604 647-6148. Additionally, if you have any questions or comments regarding the treatment of MVA patients or other ICBC-related topics, please let me know.
—L.A. Jensen, MD
ICBC Medical Community Liaison
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org