An “impressive tool for change” is how Dr Judy Dercksen describes group visits—one of four modules offered by the General Practice Services Committee’s Practice Support Program (PSP).
The Quesnel GP, who practised in South Africa until 5 years ago, first learned about group visits at an Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) conference in the US. She was immediately taken with the approach, which puts chronic disease patients together for medical visits—and in the process improves access to medical appointments, uses resources more efficiently, helps motivate behavior change, and ultimately improves outcomes.
“The vast majority of my diabetes patients—some of whom have been very resistant—have made noticeable changes in their lifestyle,” says Dr Dercksen.
Who can participate?
A group medical visit includes several patients with the same or similar chronic conditions who meet with a health care team that consists of two or more of the physician, medical office assistant, nurse, dietitian, or specialist. Candidates for group visits are patients with chronic illness or particular problems (e.g., diabetes, blood pressure management) who need regular monitoring, patients in a specific age group (e.g., frail elderly), and patients who might benefit from a support structure.
Group visits allow patients to learn from providers as well as from other patients. There’s more time to address psychosocial issues, which in turn helps patients put their illness into perspective and boosts their confidence in their self-management abilities.
Enderby GP Dr Allison Rankin says group visits would work in any practice with complex or elderly patients, or those with comorbidities. “Let’s face it—these days, that’s most practices,” she says.
Dr Rankin also learned about group visits at an IHI conference, and is now a GP champion on Interior Health’s PSP team. In that role, she will mentor her colleagues participating in the group visit module.
Group visits: Coming soon
PSP group visit modules will soon be available in all health authorities. The sessions will enable practices to identify the group visit model that will work best in that practice, identify patient populations, plan, conduct, and evaluate group visits, and identify patient issues and outcomes.
“There is no set recipe for group visits—my team has tried a few different ways,” says Dr Rankin. Her most recent sessions—with chronic pain patients—have been extremely successful. She has just completed her fifth session and the group is at the point of exchanging contact information with each other, sharing resources, and arranging for other participating health professionals for upcoming sessions.
“I was at the point where I thought I couldn’t help my pain patients,” says Dr Rankin. “But when you put them together in a group and they can support each other as well as get the medical attention they need, things really turn around.”
Medical care is always part of the visit, says Dr Rankin. “Patient evaluations, necessary lab tests or physical exams, and updating of charts and flow sheets still happen,” she says. “It just takes place in a more relaxed setting, which reduces anxiety and leads to better and broader education.”
The GPSC, a BCMA/Ministry of Health joint committee, administers approximately $100 million annually through the Full Service Family Practice Incentive Program, which is designed to support improvements in primary care. These include:
• Complex care
• Facility and community case conferencing
• Chronic disease management
• Community Based Mental Health Initiative
• Family Physicians for BC (FPs4BC)
• Maternity Care for BC (MC4BC)
Through the Practice Support Program, GPSC offers training modules in advanced access, group medical visits, managing patients with chronic diseases, and patient self-management.
Lead, Change Management and Practice Support
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org