As a pathologically goal-oriented person, I find long waits in line are usually a teeth-gnashing, expletive-mumbling endurance test, but a recent 2-hour period of standing (more like fidgety dancing) in an interminably slow lineup at the passport office offered me time to reflect on one facet of our current health care crisis. After the first 30 minutes of what I now suspect was very annoying behavior for my fellow queue-ers, I began to wonder if it was just me or whether doctors as a group don’t wait very well. Then my superego kicked in and conveniently validated my premise that most docs don’t wait very well.
For the most part, doctors are rushing to get to the next patient, the next hospital, the next night without call, and, most importantly, the next vacation. But this inability to tolerate anything but minute wait times is a bit of a paradox as, for the most part, we seem prepared to tolerate criminally long wait times for our patients without doing much about them beyond some regular grumbling and grousing to patients, colleagues, cocktail party acquaintances, and the next-door neighbor. However, most of us would not tolerate having to wait for access to medical care for ourselves, our family members, or our close friends.
I wonder why more doctors are not speaking out about how far too many of our patients have to wait for definitive care. In many instances, these long, cruel waits are thrust upon our most vulnerable citizens at the expense of whatever remaining health reserves they possess and, in some (often highly publicized) instances, their lives.
If there is evidence that a complementary, parallel system of private insurance works in virtually every political system in which it has been tried, why aren’t more of us demanding that our association representatives, MLAs, and MPs engage in a proper public dialogue, free from political ideology?
On the other hand, perhaps as a nation we are so accustomed to waiting that the actual physical act of waiting doesn’t stir the kind of collective public anger that in many countries has forced legislators to overhaul their own previously dysfunctional health care systems with success. However, as citizens and physicians, we should not be prepared to accept that without reasonable access to care, many of our patients have to wait with eager anticipation for their own demise in order to finally be free from pain and disability.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org