It is a sad fact that the rationing of health care in Canada extends to the rationing of medical school places for qualified applicants.
It is a sad fact that the rationing of health care in Canada extends to the rationing of medical school places for qualified applicants. In the wake of the 1991 Barer-Stoddart report, BC (like many other provinces) acted to reduce enrollment in medical schools. Years later, governments began to recognize their error, and have recently increased the number of doctors in training.
Medical schools continue to reject the vast majority of suitably qualified applicants. An estimated 3570 young Canadians currently attend 75 foreign medical schools. That is an inexcusable exodus of Canadian talent.
Canada is well short of the OECD average and it has been estimated that we need 26 000 more doctors. By extrapolation, it is clear that even the current expanded UBC Medical School will not generate the numbers of doctors BC will need.
At a recent meeting of a group that included many successful leaders in our profession, this topic was raised. It led to a further discussion on medical school applications. Virtually none of those present felt they would have succeeded in gaining entry to medical school if current methodologies had applied in their time.
I remember how aspiring doctors used to be selected. It was a simple process; grades were evaluated. The interviewers were physicians, including experienced specialists, generalists, and those in training. They were expected to be fair, principled, and objective—surely not too much to expect of well-selected colleagues. There were no artificial constraints placed on the interview process. Unethical or unfair interviews were an extreme rarity and could be appealed. The process is now quite different.
The bad news is that the current process is rejecting not just qualified candidates, but potentially outstanding ones. The good news is that the ratio of excellent and well-qualified applicants (five for every position) is so high that we still manage to select very good students. I believe that is achieved in spite of, not because of, the selection procedure.
Play with and arrange some coloured blocks. Write an essay on which animal you would like to be. Settle a pretend argument between two overacting actors. Describe an image (that only you can see) such that a person behind you can draw it. These are examples of the process that applicants for medical school places at UBC must master. They are components of what is (in my view) a contrived, artificial, and bizarre MMI (multiple mini interview) process that we have somehow embraced.
I have listened recently to examples of successful and unsuccessful medical school applications, and have been startled by some of the stories I have heard. Rejected applicants included an extremely bright and accomplished elite national-level athlete who drew a blank on one of the arbitrary non-academic boxes that the evaluators were obliged to consider.
Another was an outstanding student who was marked down for a lack of volunteer work. She was the daughter of a single mother and worked nights and weekends to help support her younger siblings, while paying her own undergraduate tuition fees. The “equity” rules limit imparting knowledge of personal data such as the occupation or social status of a parent.
It seems that it would be considered heresy for the committee to be formally aware that a parent was a physician. There are some statistics to show that, relative to medical schools around the world, we admit fewer children of physicians. Yet surely there is some potential value in knowing that a candidate understands the nature of the lifestyle associated with the practice of medicine? I am a great believer in the dispersal and sharing of all information that will help identify suitable applicants.
Those involved in the selection procedure should be equipped and able to separate out bias. Otherwise they should not be involved in the process. If pure objectivity is the goal, then perhaps a computer program could be developed to select all applicants.
I respect the expertise of those who are qualified in education, and they should have some advisory input into the selection methodology for medical school places. Perhaps I am naive to believe that physicians—especially those in active clinical practice—should lead that process. After all, their whole life is spent interviewing and evaluating individuals at an intimate level. They make important decisions using such skills and expertise. They understand what it means to be a doctor.
Colored blocks have their place in kindergarten. Pretending to be an animal has its place in preschool. Actors have their place on the stage and in the theatre. Drawing has a role in art classes. None, in my opinion, should be involved in the serious process of selecting suitable candidates for entry into our profession.
Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally
accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.
About the ICMJE and citation styles
The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.
An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.
BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:
- Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
- There is no period after the journal name.
- Page numbers are not abbreviated.
For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org