An apple a day is worth a pound of cure

Aphorisms, even about prevention, can be annoying. However, if we ignore the physician’s role in prevention, we fail to maximize physicians’ potential productivity. For example, since cigarette smoking accounted for 7% of medical care use and costs in recent times[1,2] and since a large part of the damage can be reversed by stopping smoking,[3,4] there would be considerable gain for our health care system if all practitioners systematically addressed smoking and just a few other modifiable major-risk factors, such as physical inactivity, problem drinking, and unhealthy diet.

All this is nice talk, but you may be pressed for time in your practice. If you’re a physician, you don’t get paid for prevention. You may not even be sure how some forms of prevention work. So what action do you take?

During the past several years, the exemplary provincial Prevention Support Program adopted the strategy of identifying a short list of prevention problems and then offering interested physicians and their office staff brief training to work from a prevention flow sheet. It was well received by both patients and staff and the early evaluations showed positive trends. Unfortunately, it is no longer in operation.

We at the Society for Clinical Preventive Health Care urge you to do what many BC physicians have been doing since 1990: use the help of the BC Stop Smoking Program. We have provided provincial health professionals with clinical materials, patient materials, training, up-to-date information, and consultation. Two population surveys of BC smokers have shown that by taking a few seconds or minutes to do brief clinical tobacco intervention, physicians have helped their patients achieve extraordinarily high levels of smoking cessation (60% to 65% of smokers advised to stop by physicians have done so).[5] This is a highly cost-effective maneuver when it is spread over a large population.

The Stop Smoking Program aims to translate evidence-based recommendations for prevention into effective approaches suited to the brevity of the average patient visit. Changing the intervention paradigm from one of badgering the patient to stop smoking to one of planting motivational seeds, watching the preventive implant grow, and then finally delivering the full goods—counseling, medication, and follow-up when the patient is ready to stop—has worked well.

The society is expanding to help smokers who also have problems with drinking, depression, and physical inactivity. Specifically, we have modest funding from the federal tobacco control program to develop a role analogous to that of the dental hygienist—someone who is a clinical educator and coordinator of interventions who will help smokers by paying attention to these three risk factors. At this point, we refer to this role as “preventive hygienist.” We invite you to contact us to discuss your thoughts about how this preventive hygienist model can work in the primary health care setting (contact details below).

Another project we are working on is the development of a national network of professionals involved in implementing clinical prevention practices called the Clinical Prevention Implementation Network. Clinical preventive programs can be quite isolated from each other and will benefit from sharing clinical strategies, materials, training, etc. We expect to soon have the resources to build a directory of programs, practitioners, researchers, and policymakers across Canada who are involved in delivering clinical prevention (as defined by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care).

The Society for Clinical Preventive Health Care invites any reader interested in clinical prevention to join us. The organization’s mission is to promote the implementation of those clinical interventions that the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (www.ctfphc.org) has found to be effective and to discourage those proven to be ineffective. This is the first year that the Society for Clinical Preventive Health Care has asked health professionals to become members see (www.clinicalprevention.ca).

Dr Bill Mackie is the current president of the society, Dr Paul Wong is the treasurer, and I am the secretary. The remaining Board members include Drs Lorna Medd, Mark Fromberg, Ray Baker, and Alan Clews.

We are moving our office to 203– 718 W. Broadway, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G8, tel: 604 872-5573, fax: 604 872-5594, e-mail: info@clinicalprevention.ca.

Hail to your interest in prevention!

—Fred Bass, MD
Member, Addictions Committee


References

1. Bass F. Medical care use attributable to cigarette smoking [doctoral thesis]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1973.
2. Medical care expenditures attributable to cigarette smoking—United States, 1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1994;43:469-472. PubMed Abstract
3. Moller AM, Villebro N, Pedersen T, et al. Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: A randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2002;359:114-117. PubMed Abstract Full Text
4. US National Cancer Institute. Smoking and tobacco control monograph 8: Changes in cigarette-related disease risks and their implication for prevention and control. NIH Publ No 97-4213; Bethesda: NIH, Feb 1995.
5. Nordic Research Group (formerly Campbell, Goodell, Traynor). Smoker surveys of January 1998 and July 2003. Vancouver: Nordic Research, 1998, 2003.

Fred Bass, MD, DSc. An apple a day is worth a pound of cure. BCMJ, Vol. 48, No. 9, November, 2006, Page(s) 436 - COHP.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply