Using payment numbers and payment forms correctly

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 59 , No. 9 , November 2017 , Pages 448-486 Billing Tips

Doctors of BC has recently been made aware that some physicians are confusing the use of payment numbers and payment forms. Practitioners should understand how the numbers differ and how to use them correctly with the appropriate forms.


Doctors of BC has recently been made aware that some physicians are confusing the use of payment numbers and payment forms. Practitioners should understand how the numbers differ and how to use them correctly with the appropriate forms.

It is important to remember that practitioner number and payment number are distinct terms, and both are assigned to practitioners. The practitioner number is yours alone and is unique to you. Your personal payment number is also unique, but a business entity such as a clinic or a corporation can also have a payment number. Payment numbers reflect different business arrangements that a practitioner may have.

It has come to light that some physicians have been linking their personal payment numbers to a clinic’s bank account, which is not a good practice. While it is quite common for payments to be assigned to a clinic or to a principal physician when a practitioner is doing a locum, it is important that this process be completed correctly; if it is not, the payments a practitioner receives from different places of work could be misdirected. For this reason, it is important to understand that the Application for Direct Bank Payment form and the Assignment of Payment form are different and are intended for distinct purposes.

The first, the Application for Direct Bank Payment form (HLTH 2832) should be used only when you want your MSP payments to be deposited into an account that you control personally or into a professional corporation account that you hold closely.

The second, the Assignment of Payment form (HLTH 2870) is to be used where payments need to be directed elsewhere (e.g., to a clinic or a principal physician for whom you are doing a locum). Section C. 9 (Assignment of Payment) in the Preamble to the Medical Services Commission Payment Schedule covers these situations. This allows services claimed by a practitioner to be paid for directly to the clinic’s or principal’s payment number, thereby reflecting the business arrangements.

Further, Section C. 7 (MSP Billing Number) of the Preamble requires that all claims submitted to MSP include both a practitioner number and a personal payment number. In a correctly completed Assignment of Payment form, each claim identifies both the practitioner who provided the service (by the practitioner number) and the entity that received payment for the service (by the payment number).

Section C. 9 also states, “Even though the payment has been assigned, the responsibility for the clinical service and its appropriate billing remains with the practitioner whose practitioner number is used.”

In summary, your personal payment number is for you only, and it should always remain linked to a corporate or personal bank account in your control. Although your practitioner number is unique, it may be associated with many different payment numbers to reflect different business arrangements. Physicians are responsible for the accuracy of the claims associated with their practitioner number in all of their various business arrangements.
—Lorne Verhulst, MD
Chair, Patterns of Practice Committee

hidden


This article is the opinion of the Patterns of Practice Committee and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board. For further information contact Juanita Grant, manager, audit and billing, Physician and External Affairs, at 604 638-2829 or jgrant@doctorsofbc.ca.

Lorne Verhulst, MD. Using payment numbers and payment forms correctly. BCMJ, Vol. 59, No. 9, November, 2017, Page(s) 448-486 - Billing Tips.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.