EMR audit pitfalls

Issue: BCMJ, vol. 59 , No. 4 , April 2017 , Pages 219 Billing Tips

The use of electronic medical records (EMRs) for keeping patient records has become the norm rather than the exception in BC.


The use of electronic medical records (EMRs) for keeping patient records has become the norm rather than the exception in BC. EMRs are not only a fundamental component in keeping patient records, but also how physicians submit billings to the Medical Services Plan (MSP) for services rendered. Before EMRs were implemented, physicians used paper charts to keep patient records and a billing software to submit their billings to MSP. It is becoming more common for physicians to use one system for both tasks. 

The Patterns of Practice Committee has a few audit tips for physicians who use EMRs.

The billing field
The billing field in the EMR is not the patient record. The billing field simply represents a claim submitted to MSP, similar to an invoice. If the Billing Integrity Program (BIP) or Service Verification Group (SVG) requests patient records, such records are considered to include consultation reports, progress notes, or operative reports. These records should demonstrate evidence that the service provided met the billing rules for the fee item claimed. Neither BIP nor SVG asks for, or accepts, copies of your billing field as evidence that the service provided is consistent with the fee item billed. 

Likewise, if you are audited, it is the patient’s record that comes under scrutiny and the medical inspector will look to see if the fee-item criteria had been met.  

If a fee item has a requirement, for example, a start and end time, you should ensure it is in both the billing field and the patient’s record. 

Fee codes
Do not rely on your EMR to look up the most appropriate fee code to bill. The EMR does not know if you meet the criteria to bill that fee. Always refer to the payment schedule and the preamble to ensure you are billing the appropriate fee and meeting the criteria. 

Allowing your EMR to set defaults, such as automatic billings for patients, can lead to billing for patients you may not have seen. Defaults should be used as a reminder to bring patients in for follow-up or care plans, not to bill automatically. 

Additional resources
For information beyond being aware of the audit pitfalls noted above, review the following documents from the CMPA and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC (CPSBC) for more information on good practice guidelines pertaining to EMRs.
•    CMPA. Documentation: Electronic medical records (www.cmpa-acpm.ca/serve/docs/ela/goodpracticesguide/pages/communication/Documentation/electronic_medical_records-e.html)
•    CPSBC. Professional standards and guidelines: Electronic Medical Re-cords (www.cpsbc.ca/files/pdf/PSG-Electronic-Medical-Records.pdf)

—Lorne Verhulst, MD
Chair, Patterns of Practice Committee$

hidden


This article is the opinion of the Patterns of Practice Committee and has not been peer reviewed by the BCMJ Editorial Board. For further information contact Juanita Grant, manager, audit and billing, Physician and External Affairs, at 604 638-2829 or jgrant@doctorsofbc.ca.

Lorne Verhulst, MD. EMR audit pitfalls. BCMJ, Vol. 59, No. 4, April, 2017, Page(s) 219 - Billing Tips.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.