What’s in a name? “Doctors of BC” launches 3-year strategic plan

portrait of William Cunningham

Your association is embarking on a new 3-year strategic plan, the result of a year-long process in which Board members weighed and prioritized the needs of the profession. 

The most visible sign of change is our new name—Doctors of BC. But in reality, the changes are much deeper and more profound. I’d like to outline how we got where we are today, and how we plan to move forward. Then I’ll talk a little bit more about the name change.

At the start of last year, staff at Doctors of BC held discussions with doctors (members and non members), residents and students, committee members, association staff, and the general public to get a full understanding of how you see the association and what you want from it.

You and your patients told us that you want us to make our profession more influential so we can help build a stronger health care system. You told us that you want us to do better when it comes to engagement—not just with you, but also by partnering with patients, government, health authorities, and other professionals to promote physician services in our communities and health care facilities. You told us you want us to be a stronger advocate for you, so that you can advocate for your patients and enhance your professional satisfaction.

We heard you, and that’s where our new direction comes in. You will see in our strategic plan that Doctors of BC will continue to do the work we already do well—such as negotiations, member benefits, and member services—but we will do it in a way that is more engaged with our members. The plan also shows where we will make significant strides forward in the areas of engagement, collaboration, innovation, and promoting physician leadership. 

Our commitments include:
•    Promoting two-way communications with members, being accessible to you and responding to your needs, and understanding and advancing the interests of the entire profession.
•    Assisting you so you can provide the highest quality patient care in your communities through local initiatives such as Divisions of Family Practice and in new facilities-based programs to increase, influence, and strengthen our collective voice. 
•    Reinforcing engagement with partners by continuing to collaborate with government on the solid work of the joint committees and on the development and implementation of policies and programs that promote the best standard of health care. We will also advocate for increased health promotion of the population at large.

The key is engagement—when as physicians we are truly engaged and working together, we can bring about positive change.

Now, let’s talk about the name change. Why did we do it? Based on our strategic plan work, the Board felt it was time for the organization representing you to be clear and direct about exactly who we are—the doctors of British Columbia. It tells the world we are ready to move forward in a positive and proactive way. It shows we are proud of our profession and confident in our ability to make a meaningful difference. 

We also discovered in our research that the public had little or no understanding of the role and function of the BCMA. Our new name will help build a stronger connection with the public, which is necessary to help us become a more influential profession. In fact, once people were told what the BCMA represents, they saw a real need for us to advocate on matters of importance to patients and physicians.

There is a lot behind our name change—a lot of thought, strategizing, and the creation of a strong foundation for the future. For Doctors of BC, it’s all about doctors working as partners to make a meaningful difference—for our patients, for our profession, and for the health care system as a whole. We are, indeed, better together.

For more information on the Doctors of BC strategic plan, go to www.doctorsofbc.ca.
—William Cunningham, MD
President, Doctors of BC

William Cunningham, MD, CCFP, CCFP (EM). What’s in a name? “Doctors of BC” launches 3-year strategic plan. BCMJ, Vol. 56, No. 1, January, February, 2014, Page(s) 9 - President's Comment.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply