Acknowledgment of referral

As an old, retired specialist, I am driven nuts by a certain policy among some specialists! I am referring to the policy of making no contact with a patient who has been referred until an appointment can be arranged. As I understand this policy, each referral is filed, and when an appointment time becomes clear, the patient is contacted. This policy assumes that the referral process is infallible. It has been known for referrals to get lost in cyberspace. This means that the patient receives no recognition that a referral has been received. How long should a patient who hears nothing wait to discover that the referral got lost?

I believe that all specialists’ offices should contact the patient as soon as they receive a referral. The patient should be informed of the office policy. They may be told that they should expect a call in N weeks, when they will be given an appointment, if this is how the office works.
—Ben R. Wilkinson, MB, FRCSC
Yellow Point

The BC College of Physicians and Surgeons has published a guideline addressing the above concern in detail (www.cpsbc.ca/files/pdf/PSG-Referral-Consultation-Process.pdf). Briefly stated, the College recommends that consulting physicians acknowledge receipt of referrals as soon as possible, at the same time indicating if the referral is being accepted or rejected. The College also expects that the consultant will promptly advise both the patient and referring physician of the date and time of the appointment. —ED

Ben R. Wilkinson, MB, FRCSC. Acknowledgment of referral. BCMJ, Vol. 63, No. 2, March, 2021, Page(s) 55 - Letters.



Above is the information needed to cite this article in your paper or presentation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends the following citation style, which is the now nearly universally accepted citation style for scientific papers:
Halpern SD, Ubel PA, Caplan AL, Marion DW, Palmer AM, Schiding JK, et al. Solid-organ transplantation in HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:284-7.

About the ICMJE and citation styles

The ICMJE is small group of editors of general medical journals who first met informally in Vancouver, British Columbia, in 1978 to establish guidelines for the format of manuscripts submitted to their journals. The group became known as the Vancouver Group. Its requirements for manuscripts, including formats for bibliographic references developed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), were first published in 1979. The Vancouver Group expanded and evolved into the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which meets annually. The ICMJE created the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals to help authors and editors create and distribute accurate, clear, easily accessible reports of biomedical studies.

An alternate version of ICMJE style is to additionally list the month an issue number, but since most journals use continuous pagination, the shorter form provides sufficient information to locate the reference. The NLM now lists all authors.

BCMJ standard citation style is a slight modification of the ICMJE/NLM style, as follows:

  • Only the first three authors are listed, followed by "et al."
  • There is no period after the journal name.
  • Page numbers are not abbreviated.


For more information on the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals, visit www.icmje.org

BCMJ Guidelines for Authors

Leave a Reply