Mitochondrial disease is a clinically heterogeneous, often multisystem disorder that can present from birth to old age. Diagnosis is complex and requires the integration of information obtained by history, laboratory testing, imaging, and muscle biopsy.
Patient management focuses mainly on supportive care with monitoring and treatment of organ-related complications of mitochondrial disease as we await the results of ongoing clinical trials looking at the efficacy of various treatments.
Investigation and diagnosis
As many of the investigations required to diagnose mitochondrial disease are not widely available and are often difficult to interpret, referral to a specialist to coordinate investigations is warranted when a family physician suspects mitochondrial disease. The clinical features that might arouse suspicion include a broad spectrum of findings that are described more fully in the following article, “Mitochondrial disease clinical manifestations.”
A diagnosis of mitochondrial respiratory chain disorder requires an amalgamation of clinical, biochemical, enzymatic, histopathological, and molecular data. The disparate data may be scored as major or minor abnormalities and are then considered in terms of published classification systems.[1-3]
The outcome of this process is a statement of how probable it is that the patient has a primary mitochondrial disease on a scale ranging from “unlikely” to “definite.” In between are “possible” and “probable” mitochondrial disease designations.
Although these latter categories are unsatisfactory for both patients and care providers, they are necessary given our current lack of understanding of mitochondrial disease. Patients in the possible and probable categories may eventually be diagnosed with an alternate disorder of which mitochondrial dysfunction is only a secondary manifestation.
The published diagnostic criteria are heavily dependent on investigation of skeletal muscle. Muscle biopsy investigations include histopathology, electron microscopy, respiratory chain enzymology, and molecular analysis of mitochondrial DNA.
Ancillary investigations, including laboratory tests, imaging, exercise testing, and electromyography (EMG), may be useful to identify patients at highest risk for mitochondrial disease prior to performing a muscle biopsy, and to improve the diagnostic yield of this invasive procedure. Although skeletal muscle biopsy is usually needed for a diagnosis, noninvasive DNA testing on other sample types may be possible in patients with recognizable clinical syndromes.
Blood and urine testing
The investigation of a patient for mitochondrial disease includes blood and urine testing as shown in Table 1. Lactic acidemia is an important but inconsistent indicator of mitochondrial disease. This finding is often present in more severely affected patients with childhood onset of disease, but may be missing in patients with less severe involvement. Thus, the absence of an elevation in lactate cannot be used to exclude a diagnosis of mitochondrial disease.
Because the central nervous system is involved in 30% to 60% of patients with mitochondrial disease, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) are important diagnostic tools. The brain MRI results may display both relatively specific abnormalities (such as basal ganglia calcification) and nonspecific abnormalities (such as white matter changes). Brain MRS, available in Vancouver, may be used as an alternative to lumbar puncture for CSF lactate testing to document intracerebral lactate elevations.
Exercise testing is an alternative technique for the evaluation of possible mitochondrial myopathy. The key features of a mitochondrial myopathy are a low anaerobic threshold (indicating impaired or inefficient oxygen utilization) and an increased respiratory exchange ratio indicating an inefficient utilization of fatty acids as an energy source. However, the sensitivity and specificity of exercise testing have not been clearly defined and interpretation remains difficult.
The majority of patients with mitochondrial disease have skeletal muscle complaints and sometimes symptoms of a peripheral neuropathy. Electromyography (EMG) is a useful diagnostic test to screen for myopathic changes and to delineate the type of peripheral neuropathy that may also be subclinical.
Many patients with mitochondrial myopathy have normal or nonspecific changes on EMG studies. However, normal EMG findings can still be helpful. A metabolic myopathy may still be present since patients with most other forms of clinical myopathy (such as inflammatory myopathies) usually have diagnostic abnormalities on EMG testing.
A biopsy of skeletal muscle permits histopathology, electron microscopy, respiratory chain enzymology, and mtDNA testing, provided a specialized sample handling protocol is followed. The logistics of sample handling must be worked out clearly prior to the procedure. Physicians considering mitochondrial investigations should contact the Biochemical Genetics Laboratory for guidance and special sample handling procedures (phone 604 875-2307 or e-mail email@example.com).
Muscle histopathology and electron microscopy
Certain histopathological features are specific indicators of mitochondrial dysfunction. For example, the presence of multiple ragged-red fibres with modified Gomori trichrome stain indicates abnormalities of mitochondrial function with compensatory mitochondrial proliferation.
Electron microscopy may show abnormal mitochondria with increased size and abnormal cristae (see histopathological findings in Figures 5 and 6 of “Primer on mitochondrial disease” in this issue). Further, a histologically and ultrastructurally normal muscle biopsy does not exclude a mitochondrial disease since the biopsied muscle may not be involved in the disease process.
Muscle respiratory chain enzymology
In BC respiratory chain enzymology is performed on frozen skeletal muscle tissue. The activities of the enzyme complexes involved in making adenosine triphosphate (ATP) are measured and expressed relative to citrate synthase, a marker enzyme; see Figure 2 of the article “Primer on mitochondrial disease” in this issue. However, because not all respiratory chain defects are expressed in skeletal muscle, these tests may be normal in some patients with mitochondrial disease. When abnormal, the pattern of enzyme results often helps elucidate the underlying genetic cause and thus directs further investigations.
Depending on the clinical and pathological features, testing of nuclear DNA (nDNA) or mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) (or both) may be indicated to confirm the presence of a specific inherited mitochondrial disease.
In the case of a suspected maternally inherited syndrome, mtDNA is analyzed.
For this analysis, skeletal muscle mtDNA is preferred because of its relative abundance and its retention of mtDNA mutations over time. Urine and blood testing may also be adequately sensitive depending on the mutation type. In general, if one of several relatively common known pathogenic mtDNA mutations is identified in a symptomatic patient, a diagnosis of mitochondrial disease is definite.
However, even patients who have a known pathogenic mtDNA mutation may be asymptomatic depending on the percentage load of mutant mtDNA (degree of heteroplasmy). For this reason, once an index case has been identified with a mtDNA defect, family members should be offered pretest genetic counseling to work through the implications, limitations, and potential benefits of mtDNA testing.
Unlike mtDNA testing, nDNA testing can be performed in any nucleated cell type or tissue, with peripheral blood being the most commonly used. Finding a nuclear gene defect permits accurate prenatal testing in a subsequent pregnancy.
The success of finding a nuclear gene defect is variable, and such testing is only pursued in the context of a specific clinical or pathologic phenotype. Advances in molecular technology and the identification of novel nuclear genes are expected to improve diagnostic yield of mitochondrial disease in the future.
Therapy and management
The management of patients with mitochondrial disease involves a three-part approach:
• Prescribing medications and lifestyle measures designed to improve mitochondrial function.
• Screening for potentially treatable complications.
• Providing support for the patient and family who have been affected by this chronic disease.
Improving mitochondrial function
The vitamins and other supplements listed in Table 2 are referred to as the “mitochondrial cocktail”—a combination of agents known to be involved in mitochondrial function. The use of the cocktail is largely based on the assumption that higher doses of these agents may improve mitochondrial energy generation. With the exception of coenzyme Q10, this assumption remains largely unproven, although randomized trials are ongoing.
Since the supplements in the cocktail are expensive and are not covered in BC by Pharmacare, we often introduce the agents sequentially, having the patient chart symptoms to see which is of benefit. However, for patients with very severe manifestations (such as liver disease and cardiac failure), the time needed to try the supplements sequentially may be a concern and the entire cocktail can be started at once.
Another cocktail component, the amino acid arginine, has been studied with some degree of rigor in the treatment of patients with mitochondrial encephalopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS). In these patients, there is endothelial dysfunction that impairs the delivery of substrate to the brain to make energy.
Thus, although this differs from stroke due to atherosclerosis, where there is an anatomic lesion (a plaque) preventing the delivery of substrate, the net result is the same in that the brain has an energy deficit. Arginine improves endothelial function through the generation of nitric oxide.
Researchers have found that intravenous arginine improved stroke-like symptoms when given during the episode and oral arginine reduced the number of stroke-like events in a Japanese cohort of patients with MELAS. The use of arginine in patients with disorders other than MELAS has not been systematically investigated. A protocol for the use of arginine can be obtained by contacting the Adult Metabolic Diseases Clinic at Vancouver General Hospital.
Exercise training is one of the few treatment modalities that has shown a benefit in terms of mitochondrial function in randomized trials. The effect of exercise training is to improve the efficiency of the mitochondria in generating ATP.
In one study, an 8-week aerobic training program (three to four times/week for 20 to 30 minutes each time with a defined target heart rate) resulted in an improvement in aerobic capacity of 30% and even greater improvements in other parameters designed to look at mitochondrial function. Many patients with mitochondrial disease complain of exertional myalgias and are therefore reluctant to exercise.
However, the resultant deconditioning effect will only worsen their mitochondrial function. Thus, one of the most important recommendations that can be made to patients is that they do some low-intensity exercise training. Consultation with a rehabilitation therapist to guide exercise training may be helpful, particularly in patients with disabilities that limit exercise options.
The monitoring protocols for patients with confirmed or suspected mitochondrial disease are intended to look for complications that arise more frequently in patients with disorders of energy metabolism. These protocols are not meant to be inclusive and would need to be modified based on the particular symptoms demonstrated by the patients and on the underlying genetic cause of their disease.
A suggested monitoring schedule used by the Adult Metabolic Disease Clinic is shown in Table 3. Pediatric patients who have more severe disease may need to be assessed more often.
Family A: Diagnosis and management
The family introduced in the previous article, “Primer on mitochondrial disease,” provides an example of the diagnostic and management process. The index patient (IV-4) presented with clinical features of subacute necrotizing encephalopathy (Leigh syndrome).
After a second person in the family (patient V-2) developed severe symptoms of mitochondrial disease, a defect in the mtDNA was found by molecular analysis. Once the specific familial mutation was identified, direct testing of other family members became relatively simple.
Several therapies were tried in the most severely affected family members, including a mitochondrial cocktail and ketogenic diet, but these were ineffective and did not prevent progressive neurological deterioration. Symptomatic and supportive therapies then became the mainstays of care for members of Family A with manifestations of mitochondrial disease.
Despite the complexity of the investigations required, a definitive diagnosis of mitochondrial disease can be achieved in many cases. Such a diagnosis may provide prognostic information for the patient and other family members, as seen in the example of Family A.
Given the heterogeniety of respiratory chain defects and the variable patterns of inheritance (sporadic, autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or maternal), a specific diagnosis is also invaluable for family counseling and possibly for providing the option of prenatal testing in a subsequent pregnancy.
Evidence-based therapeutic options to improve the course of disease are limited. However, there remains a need for patient counseling, supportive care, and symptomatic therapy to minimize secondary complications associated with mitochondrial disease.